A good test for telling apart anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism is swap in a Nazi and ask yourself what he would say differently in the same situation.
Haaretz' Gideon Levy, a guy who hates Israel more than most actual Nazis do, lost an Oxford Union debate over destroying Israel. In response he blamed... the Jews.
"Unfortunately, a majority of “this House” rejected the proposition, perhaps because most of the members of the union are wealthy, white conservatives and its president is Jewish."
This is an organization willing to hold a debate on the destruction of Israel. Odd behavior for a "conservative" group run by the evil Jewish conspiracy.
Gideon Levy can't admit that he lost the debate or that he couldn't make a compelling case. Instead he has to blame the "Jewish" president. This is exactly what Nazis used to do. It's classical anti-Semitism.
And speaking of Gideon Levy and classical anti-Semitism.
Haaretz, the radical left-wing paper, descended into blatant anti-Semitism with AIPAC coverage headlines such as Gideon Levy's "The Conference of the Elders of Zion" and Peter Beinart's "Trump at AIPAC: A Jewish Betrayal of the United States".
One wonders where all the leftists who claimed to be outraged by "Renegade Jew" back then were.
But the anti-Semitism test remains. What would an actual Nazi do differently?