1. A special prosecutor investigating Trump and his staffers based on a dossier funded by Hillary Clinton is not authoritarian. Not even when key figures on his team and one judge are Clinton donors.
2. Obama staffers eavesdropping on Trump staffers based on a dossier funded by Hillary Clinton is not authoritarian
3. Investigating Hillary Clinton.... is authoritarian
And best of all this comes from an"exclusive interview" with Mother Jones. MJ was the publication where Fusion GPS first laundered Hillary's anti-Trump dossier. David Corn, the editor it was laundered to, probably wasn't available on account of his Bill Clinton like behavior coming to light.
Hillary Clinton responded on Wednesday to news that the Trump administration is considering appointing a special counsel to investigate her alleged ties to the Uranium One deal, calling the move “a disastrous step into politicizing the Justice Department” and “such an abuse of power.”
In an exclusive interview with Mother Jones, Clinton said such an investigation would have devastating consequences for the justice system in America. “If they send a signal that we’re going to be like some dictatorship, like some authoritarian regime, where political opponents are going to be unfairly, fraudulently investigated, that rips at the fabric of the contract we have, that we can trust our justice system,” Clinton said.
It's like some sort of dictatorship.
You know, an authoritarian system where Hillary Clinton funds an opposition dossier that is passed on to the FBI, used as a basis for eavesdropping, then rolled into an investigation and finally utilized for impeachment proceedings.
That's like some sort of authoritarian regime.